The monitoring of the employee’s lifestyle conducted by the NAZK established that the grandmother could not have such funds.
Former head of the district state administration Kyiv and the head of the police department of the capital’s River Port illegally acquired valuable assets. To hide the wealth, they recorded the purchases on their wives.
About this reported National Agency for Prevention of Corruption May 26.
The experts analyzed the declaration of the ex-head of the district administration of the capital and noticed a note that the wife took ownership of two premises of a non-residential fund worth more than 2.5 million hryvnias.
The official’s wife also somehow managed to buy a Mercedes-Benz luxury car for 3 million hryvnias.
The declarant assured that everything was purchased with money that was earned from 2020 to 2021.
But the obtained data show that they did not have the funds to purchase the specified property.
Another owner of unexpected wealth turned out to be the wife of the head of the police department of the River Port. In this case, the declarant could not think of anything better than to lie about the millionaire grandmother, who decided in her old age to give his wife an apartment for 7 million hryvnias.
However, monitoring of the employee’s lifestyle carried out by the NAKC established that the grandmother could not have such funds.
The materials collected by the detectives were sent to the Investigative Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office to resolve the issue of the initiation of legal proceedings for the purpose of confiscation of illegally obtained property in favor of Ukraine.
We will remind that on May 15, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau reported on exposure of a large-scale corruption case in the Supreme Court. Later it became known that none other than the Chairman of the Supreme Court Vsevolod Knyazev burned himself on the bribe. He was caught while receiving bribe in the amount of 2.7 million dollars.
According to media reports, Knyazev allegedly received money from people who supported the court’s decision on benefit of the oligarch Konstantin Zhevago.